Most sales managers coach deals, not reps. Here's the difference.

There's a huge difference between helping someone win a deal and teaching them how to win the next 20 without you.

Kaleb JesseeFounder, Krafted Revenue · · 7 min read

I've never met a sales leader who wished they'd added one more field to the CRM. I have met a few who wished they'd spent one more hour coaching their team.

The problem is that most of what gets called coaching isn't.

Coaching the deal vs. coaching the rep

Most sales managers aren't coaching reps. They're coaching deals.

A rep brings them an opportunity and the conversation sounds like:

  • "Have you talked to the economic buyer?"
  • "You need to multithread."
  • "Send me the proposal before it goes out."
  • "Here's what I'd say on the next call."

And sometimes that works. The deal moves forward.

But did the rep actually get better? That's the part we miss.

If I tell a rep exactly what to do every time a deal gets complicated, I'm not developing them. I'm becoming part of their sales process. If every big deal requires the manager to become the closer, you don't have a team of better sellers. You have a team that got really good at escalating deals to you.

Use the deal as coaching material

I want managers using deals as coaching material. Ask questions that build judgment instead of handing out answers:

  • Why didn't you identify the economic buyer earlier?
  • What did you hear that made you believe this opportunity was real?
  • Where did you lose control of the process?
  • What would you do differently if we restarted this deal tomorrow?

Then role play it. Listen to the actual call. Practice the moment they struggled with. Give them another scenario and see if they can apply it there. That's development.

Sometimes I absolutely jump into a deal. There are moments when winning matters and you need to help. But that should be intentional, not a habit.

Advice is not a coaching program

Most sales organizations don't have a coaching program. They have managers giving advice. Those are not the same thing.

A rep loses a deal and gets told what they should have done. A manager hears a bad discovery call and gives three pointers. Pipeline is light, so we add activity targets. Win rates drop, so we add another dashboard, another inspection, another required field. Forecasts are wrong, so we create more forecast meetings.

We keep adding management around the problem instead of developing the person. Then we wonder why behavior doesn't change.

Because knowing what you did wrong and developing the ability to do it differently are two completely different things. My debate background made that painfully clear. Winning the argument yourself doesn't mean you can teach someone else to build one.

A sales coaching system that actually changes behavior

  1. Observe real performance: calls, deal reviews, forecasts.
  2. Diagnose the actual weakness, not the symptom.
  3. Isolate one skill. Not five.
  4. Practice it through role play.
  5. Increase the difficulty until it holds up under pressure.
  6. Put it back into a real deal.
  7. Measure whether it improved.
  8. Repeat.

Sales organizations skip most of those steps. We listen to a call, leave comments, maybe give it a score, and call that coaching.

Where to find what needs coaching

Coaching starts by connecting what happens in the business to how people develop. The data is already there:

  • Pipeline reviews show where judgment might be weak.
  • CRM data shows where patterns are developing.
  • Deal reviews show how someone thinks strategically.
  • Call recordings show how they actually execute.
  • Forecasting shows whether they truly understand their business.

Coaching should cascade through every layer

This applies beyond reps. If a Director's managers aren't developing their teams, that's a coaching opportunity. If a VP can identify every problem in the business but can't develop leaders who solve those problems without them, that's a coaching opportunity too.

Over time, a rep should need their manager less. A manager should need their director less. A director should need their VP less. Not because leadership matters less, but because leadership has created more capable people.

If your people constantly need you to see the problem for them, you may be managing them. I'm not sure you're developing them.

Built from a series of my LinkedIn posts on sales coaching and leadership. Follow me on LinkedIn for more.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between deal coaching and rep coaching?

Deal coaching tells a rep what to do next on one opportunity. Rep coaching uses that opportunity to build the rep's judgment and skill so they can win the next 20 deals without the manager.

What does a good sales coaching program include?

A repeatable system: observe real performance, diagnose the actual weakness, isolate one skill, practice it, raise the difficulty, apply it in a live deal, measure the change, and repeat.

How do you know sales coaching is working?

Reps need their manager less over time, behavior changes on calls you never hear about, and results improve across the middle of the team, not only the top performers.

Next stepCoaching for sales leadersOne-to-one coaching and team training from a leader who built and coached sales organizations.Go
Kaleb Jessee
About the author

Kaleb Jessee has held every seat in a revenue organization, from seller to CRO to CEO, and has closed more than $300 million in revenue for companies from seed stage to PE-backed. He is a national champion collegiate debater and has coached six national champions. He leads Krafted Revenue.